1. Seth Speaks: Love, Sex, and Everything In Between
Why do love and creativity go hand-in-hand? Why do societal expectations around sex feel so restrictive?
In this session, Seth has quite a lot to say about the fascinating world of human sexuality.
Seth proposes that our ideas about sex are far too narrow. He suggests that humans are naturally bisexual, meaning we have the potential for love and attraction towards both men and women. This isn’t a moral failing, but rather a built-in capacity for deep connection.
Love is a vibrant energy that flows through all of us. Everyone of us knows what love is. It’s the driving force of the universe.
Our sexual expression is one way this energy becomes visible. Denying ourselves this natural expression may suppress our creative potential and lead to social problems like violence.
You might be thinking, wouldn’t widespread bisexuality destroy families and societies? According to Seth, no. It is rather the opposite. Our current struggles with family dynamics, violence, and societal friction actually stem from repressing our inherent bisexuality.
Think of heterosexuality, the love between men and women, as a beautiful expression of this bisexual foundation. It allows us to create families and build communities. But it’s just one piece of the puzzle.
Accepting our full sexual nature wouldn’t weaken families. To the contrary, it would strengthen them. It would also mean more cooperation and understanding across all aspects of life, from friendships to work relationships.
Seth assures us that embracing our bisexual nature is key to unlocking our full potential, both individually and collectively. It’s the only valid way to human experience, free from judgment and limitation.
By accepting the full spectrum of our sexuality, we will create a more vibrant, peaceful, and creative world for everyone.
2. Seth on: The Psyche in Relationship to Sexual Elements. The He and She — The She and He
NotP Chapter 4: Session 769, March 29, 1976
– The Nature of the Psyche: Its Human Expression, © 2011 Laurel Davies-Butts
[… 11 paragraphs …]
The love and cooperation that forms the basis of all life, however, shows itself in many ways. Sexuality represents one aspect, and an important one. In larger terms, it is as natural for a man to love a man, and for a woman to love a woman, as it is to show love for the opposite sex. For that matter, it is more natural to be bisexual. Such is the “natural” nature of the species.
[… 3 paragraphs …]
Creativity rides the tides of love. When love is denied its natural expression, creativity suffers. Your beliefs lead you to suppose that a natural bisexuality would result in the death of the family, the destruction of morals, rampant sexual crimes, and the loss of sexual identity. I would say, however, that my last sentence adequately describes your present situation (with dry humor). The acceptance of the species’ natural bisexuality would ultimately help solve not only those problems but many others, including the large instances of violence, and acts of murder. In your terms, however, and in your circumstances, there is not apt to be any easy transition.
The parent-child relationship has its own unique emotional structure, which survives even those distortions you have placed upon it, and its ancient integrity would not be weakened, but strengthened, if greater stress were laid upon your bisexual nature.
[… 3 paragraphs …]
Now: Heterosexual love is one important expression of bisexuality, and sexually represents the reproductive abilities. Heterosexuality, however, rests upon the bisexual basis, and (intently) without man’s bisexual nature, the larger frameworks of the family — the clan, tribe, government, civilization — would be impossible.
Basically, then, man’s inherent bisexuality provides the basis for the cooperation that makes physical survival, and any kind of cultural interaction, possible. If the “battle of the sexes” were as prevalent as supposed, and as natural and ferocious, then there literally would be no cooperation between males and females for any purpose. There would be none between men or between women either, for they would be in a constant state of battle against each other.
[… 2 paragraphs …]
I am not saying that lesbianism and homosexuality are merely stages leading to heterosexuality. I am saying that lesbianism, homosexuality, and heterosexuality are valid expressions of man’s bisexual nature.
[… 2 paragraphs …]
In the social world as in the microscopic one, cooperation again is paramount. Only a basic bisexuality could give the species the leeway necessary, and prevent stereotyped behavior of a kind that would hamper creativity and social commerce. That basic sexual nature allows you the fulfillment of individual abilities, so that the species does not fall into extinction. Man’s recognition of his bisexual nature is, therefore, a must in his future.
[… 1 paragraph …]
(11:13.) Only an understanding of this inherent bisexual nature will release those qualities in each individual, regardless of sex. Those same abilities are natural characteristics of people in each race, of course, yet you have consistently made the same kind of distinctions in racial terms as you have in sexual ones, so that certain races appear as feminine or masculine to you. You project your sexual beliefs outward upon the nations, then, and often the terminology of the nations and of wars is the same as that used to describe sex.
Dirk Bosman, April 2024
All images are artificial generated by Dirk Bosman and licensed under Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0
